• RobBarrettJr.

The Path to Victory

Updated: May 2, 2020

There’s been a lot of talk about the Presidential election of 2016 and how close it was. Trump only lost to Hillary in Minnesota by 44,765 votes or 1.52%. That's the closest it's been since 1984, the year I graduated from high school. People have taken great encouragement from these numbers and have strategized to make up that difference in Greater Minnesota by increasing the vote total. The other GOP candidate running against me is focusing almost exclusively on this plan.

But is that the real story?

We all know this map that shows almost all of Minnesota voting Red in 2016 with only 9 counties voting for Hillary - St. Louis, Lake, Carlton, Olmstead, Washington, Dakota, Ramsey and Hennepin counties.

Here is a table of how the votes came in.

County Trump Hillary

All of Minnesota 1,322,951 1,367,716 (-44,765, -1.52%)

Blue Counties

Cook Co. 1,156 1,192

Lake Co. 2,932 3,007

Carlton Co. 8,160 8,460

Olmstead Co 35,668 36,268

St Louis Co. 44,630 57,771

Washington Co. 64,428 67,086

Dakota Co. 99,583 110,483

Ramsey Co. 70,894 177,738

Hennepin Co. 191,770 429,288

Totals 519,221 891,293

The rest of Minnesota voted like this.

Red Minnesota 803,730 476,423

That would mean that for Trump to win he only needs to increase Red Minnesota turnout by 5.6% - a reachable proposition.

The correct question is, did Trump do better than previous Republican candidates or did Hillary just do so poorly? Let’s take a look at recent history.

Trump only received 2,726 votes more than Romney did in 2012.

Here are the vote totals from the previous 4 Presidential elections.

Hillary 1,367,716 2016

Obama 1,546,167 2012

1,573, 354 2008

Kerry 1,445,014 2004

If we combine the last 3 Presidential elections we get an average vote total for a Democratic candidate to be 1,495,745 votes. This puts any Republican candidate at a 172,794 vote disadvantage not 44,765.

In order to overcome this number, Red Minnesota would need to increase its vote total by 21.5%. That is a big number.

The other option is flipping votes in the metro. That is my approach. I need to flip 9.6% of voter’s minds in the Metro and other Blue Minnesota areas.

The best plan is a combination of efforts. If we can increase Greater Minnesota Red turnout by 10% and flip 5.2 % in Blue Minnesota we can do this. But we still need the Metro. We can’t give up on the Twin Cities.

It’s a tough path to victory but it is reachable.

Help me do it. Elections are expensive. Click below to help Minnesota get real conservative representation in the US Senate.


Rob Barrett, Jr.

Candidate for US Senate

346 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

(This was taken from my speech at the GOP convention May 30, 2020. My name is Rob Barrett and I’m running for US Senate for the state of Minnesota. Let’s be clear. I am Pro-life. I believe life begins

As our campaign winds down Rob Barrett for Senate will rebrand to WeAreMN to keep the community service aspect going. Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram will change their identifiers to WeAreMN. Follow